I got it. You're deflecting. Since you were so wrong about Obama you want to go back to your happy place and attack Bush and co. :)
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> MG wrote: >>> >>> It's weird how willing you are to believe gubberment when it comes to >>> something that seems both plausible and logical, such as this >> >> It's fairly irrelevant to the point though. The Afghan Arabs were >> "the enemy of America's enemy" and supported in one way or another by >> America's support. >> >> But more importantly is the Bush family's personal support and >> friendship with the Saudi dictators. >> >> In other words, the US has a long history of supporting various >> dictators and regimes in the middle east including Saddam Hussein, the >> Shah, The House of Saud, et al >> >> This is why Grant's point is dead on: the ground work for today's >> Muslim terrorists was laid years ago for cheap oil and the Cold War. >> >> And no party has a monopoly of support those dictators. Maybe the >> Bush's more than others due to the House of Saud, but Presidents of >> both parties have supported this framework. >> >> Consequently Bin Laden has been able to convince the Muslim world that >> their troubles are all due to US meddling and support of dictators and >> if it weren't for the US the Muslims would be free. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:304418 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
