Agreed, but I am glad he got Van Jones fired. On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Robert Munn <[email protected]> wrote: >> From that standpoint, is he off the deep end? I don't know. I think he's on >> to something there. > > He may have some very good points, but I think the comical pandering > to his audience's biases undermines any good solid logical argument he > may have. I think that's my real problem with most of the talk show > people. They are so caught up in ranting for their audience that I > really can't take anything they say seriously. > > Same thing with Matt Taibbi's Rolling Stone article we discussed a few > months ago. If someone starts their arguments with a lengthy > character assassination and broad generalizations meant to incite an > audience (already in agreement) into foaming at the mouth then it > really doesn't matter what you have to say after that because I > already think that person is a loon. > > Generally speaking anyway...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:304950 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
