What is this wandering article's point?

- That suicide rates are high in the military?
- That a murder was motivated by racial or ethnic issues?
- That the invasions of Iraq and Afganistan were unfounded?

The article is like a huge run-on sentence of loosely related
arguments with a vauge suggestion that they each support the next.

Mainly though, I fail to understand the connection between a high
suicide rate in the general (non-Islamic) military population and
radicalization of Islamic members of the military.

Spaghetti - meet wall....

-Cameron



On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is long, but interesting.
> I didn't know that the suicide rate in the Army was so high now.
>
> -------------------------------------
> "Earlier this year, the Pentagon committed US$50 million to a study
> investigating why the suicide rate in the military is rising: it used
> to be below the suicide rate in comparable civilian groups, but now
> it’s four times higher. Thirteen American soldiers were killed by a
> gunman at Fort Hood in Texas last Thursday, but 75 others have died by
> their own hand at the same army base since the invasion of Iraq in
> 2003. Why?
>
> To most people, the answer is obvious. The wars in Iraq and
> Afghanistan have been frustrating, exhausting, and seemingly endless,
> and some people just can’t take it anymore. But the Pentagon is
> spending US$50m to search for other possible causes, because it
> doesn’t like that answer.
>
> The US military budget tops half a trillion dollars, so the military
> can splash out on diversionary studies that draw attention away from
> the main problems, which are combat fatigue and loss of faith in the
> mission. And we are seeing exactly the same pattern in the response to
> the killings in Fort Hood, although in this case the military are also
> getting the services of the US media for free.
>
> Let’s see, now. A devout Muslim officer serving in the US Army, born
> in the United States but of Palestinian ancestry, is scheduled to
> deploy to Afghanistan in the near future. He opens fire on his fellow
> soldiers, shouting ’Allahu akbar’ (’God is great’ in Arabic.) What can
> his motive have been? Hard to guess, isn’t it? Was he unhappy about
> his promotion prospects? Hmm.
>
> There is something comic in the contortions that the US media engage
> in to avoid the obvious fact that if the United States invades Muslim
> countries, some Muslim Americans are bound to think that America has
> declared war on Islam. It has not, but from Pakistan to Somalia the US
> is killing Muslims in the name of a ’war on terror.’
>
> So is it possible that the shooter in Fort Hood, Major Nidal Malik
> Hasan, who was waiting to ship out to Afghanistan, did not want to
> take a personal part in that enterprise? Might he belong to that large
> majority of Muslims (though probably a minority among American
> Muslims) who, unable to discover any rational basis for US strategy
> since 9/11, have drifted towards the conclusion that the United States
> is indeed waging a war on Islam?
>
> Perish the thought!
>
> Rather than entertain such a subversive idea, official spokespersons
> and media pundits in the United States have been trying to come up
> with some other motive for Maj Hasan’s actions. Maybe he was a coward
> who couldn’t face the prospect of combat in Afghanistan. Maybe he was
> a nut-case whose actions had no meaning at all. Or maybe he was
> unhappy at the alleged abuse he had suffered because he was
> Muslim/Arab /Palestinian.
>
> After a few days while the commentariat hesitated before competing
> narratives, the media are settling on the explanation that it was
> ethnic/racial/religious abuse that drove Nidal crazy. Bad people doing
> un-American things were ultimately responsible for the tragedy, and
> there’s an end to it.
>
> The one explanation that is excluded is that America’s wars in Muslim
> lands overseas are radicalising Muslims at home. Never mind that the
> home-grown Muslim terrorists who attacked the London transport system
> in 2005, and the various Muslim plotters who have been caught in other
> Western countries before their plans came to fruition, have almost all
> blamed the Western invasions of Muslim countries for radicalising
> them.
>
> Never mind, above all, that what really radicalised them was the fact
> that those invasions made no sense in terms of Western security. No
> Afghan has ever attacked the United States, although Arabs living in
> Afghanistan were involved in the planning of 9/11. There were no
> terrorists in Iraq, no weapons of mass destruction, and no contacts
> between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaida. So why did the US invade those
> countries?
>
> The real reasons are panic and ignorance, reinforced by militaristic
> reflexes and laced with liberal amounts of racism. But people find it
> hard to believe that big, powerful governments like those of the
> United States, Britain and the other Western powers involved in these
> foolish adventures could really be so stupid, so the conspiracy
> theories proliferate.
>
> It is a testimony to the moderation and loyalty of Muslim communities
> in the West that so few of their members have succumbed to these
> conspiracy theories. It is evidence of the profound denial that still
> reigns in the majority community in the United States that the most
> obvious explanation for Major Nidal’s actions didn’t even make the
> media’s short list.
>
> I cannot know for sure what moved Major Nidal to do the terrible
> things he did: each individual is a mystery even to himself. But I do
> see the US media careening all over the road to avoid the huge and
> obvious fact that obscures half the horizon. Time to grow up.
>
> * Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist whose artic

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:307413
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to