Woa, wrong read on what I said. Nothing about "winning". I was
honestly curious, I just didn't see it in the same light and several
other people didn't as well and I wanted to try and understand your
point of view. I actually do that. Might seem weird I guess but I am
genuinely curious when someone who I often agree with on some topics
see's something in a clearly different light than I do.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Which parts came off as anti-US to you? I'd agree that it wasn't
>> terribly well written. The way I read it was "here are some big issues
>> that people in the military and the media aren't willing to confront
>> and that may bite us all in the ass".
>
> I know this will disappoint, but I am not particularly interested in
> engaging in the pointless dialog that would result from answering this
> question.  Some of us see this clearly slanted article differently,
> and I think I am totally happy to leave it at that.
>
> You can dance around the room now, claiming to have "won" an argument
> on the internet.  I just hope someone is there to witness the dance.
> If not, perhaps video tape it and put it up on YouTube for us to
> watch.
>
> -Camer

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:307468
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to