Anti trust laws do not exist solely to deal with this kind of behavior. It is possible that a company, without any illegal, immoral or unethical behavior, can grow to a point where they too might come under fire from Anti Trust laws.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually no...that's not Capitalism, that goes against the Free Market. > It may be what the crooks of capitalism employ to get ahead. > It may be what now passes for Capitalism in the United States, but it > has nothing to do with a properly functioning Free Market system. > > ..witness now the failing world economy as a result. > > This behaviour is actually closer to closed economies, dictatorships > and communist economies. > > Anti Trust laws exist to deal with these actions for a reason, it just > seems that it is so hard to prove and to have a case heard that the > guilty party is allowed to prosper. > Intel should have been hit for half their assets at the very least. > > AMD chips have long been analysed as having better and more efficient > architectures. But we all use Intel. > The Consumer has lost out because of these criminal acts. > > 2009/11/12 Erika L. Rich <[email protected]>: >> >> aka Capitalism > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:307836 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
