Does this statement ring a bell? >> Perhaps that is all it was, but what it has become the red herring >> with which the opponents can derail the entire dialogue on climate >> change.
Or by calling the exposure a red herring you really meant tuna? On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't recall ever commenting at all on Bush and science, but this is > hardly the first time you've attributed stuff to me that I never said. > > And I defy you find any comment I have made in this discussion that > excuses the skewing of data by either side. > > Ass. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> All those years of claiming Bush was controlling science and now you >> have proof it was the other side and yet you excuse it. >> >> Shame shame. >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308984 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
