Agreed. Here I keep hearing talk of the technological fixes, when the problem is a classic Demming type of systemic error. When a dog you can retrieve from the pound and $20,000 worth of training outperforms a $5,000,000 machine, which is better for the common good?
Also there are others who could probably answer this better than I, given their experience, but its been my impression that as far as sharing between government agencies is difficult at best. From what little I've seen its like a forest of stovepipes and I'm working for a public agency. On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote: > > Then we do one of two things. Leave things the way they are and see how > long it takes for more innocent people to die, or we overhaul what we > have and put in place a system or set of systems that work. Wait, here > is another crazy idea. Get the intelligence communities to play nice > with each other. > > Larry C. Lyons wrote: >> however there are a variety of plastics etc that are very difficult to >> detect using x-rays. From what I understand (and I could be wrong) the >> reliability (both false positives and false negatives) is not fairly >> high. Much lower than a trained dog. >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309894 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
