The x-ray issue was brought up by me. You have men look at men, and women look at women. In Iraq we did this and it worked great, and no one complained.
Your issues about the dogs are valid ones as well. Which again proves my point that you will never come up with a system that will appease everyone. That being said, the dogs do not have to be right up on the explosives. I have personally seen dogs that can sniff the outside of a house and detect something. When we go into the house they will zero right in on the explosives and sometimes they are not right next to an outside wall. Dogs have very sensitive noses. I have seen my step father's labs sniff out a bird from several feet away when I went bird hunting with them. Germany has been using dogs in their airports since the 80's and I have never heard anyone complain about their presence. The Polezi will just roam the airport with their dog in hand very nonchalantly and go about their business until the dog goes off on something. Very non invasive to me. Vivec wrote: > The dogs are probably better, but I'm sure people would have a problem > with being sniffed as well. > Then you have some passengers, young children etc. that may be > mortally afraid of dogs...or allergic to dogs. > > So there would be issues there as well. > I don't quite see a problem with the X-Ray style nudity, but then you > have various religions to take into account where to see a woman naked > is a serious offence of some sort > (I don't know how followers of these religions travel > actually...thinking about it now it may be impossible?). > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309900 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
