Look at that, I'm not the only one that found that paper to be stupid: http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/commentaries/solomon_essays.pdf
"[...] the paper is entirely predicated on two implicit but false assumptions: that the computer modeling on which all of its conclusions are based is competent to predict the state of the climate a millennium or more in the future; and that the effect of atmospheric carbon-dioxide enrichment on global mean surface temperatures will be substantial." Now let's talk about facts Larry. Starting with the climate change models... On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > give it up dana. Sam has never let facts get in the way of one of his > ideological rants. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:310168 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
