typical. You're not arguing using reason and data but via authority.
in other words arguing through ignorance.

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> the fact that you are defending it is proof enough for me.
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Bullshit that's been a conservative wet dream for years. According to
>> most studies over the last several years, there is little if any left
>> wing bias, for instance see http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1180.
>>
>> moreover the UCLA and University of Missouri studies that have been
>> often cited by conservatives as evidence have been roundly criticized
>> as biased themselves and not well conducted, missing out quite a few
>> issues.
>>
>> It seems to me that all too often the right wing in this country is
>> very quick to scream bias if the particular media outlet does not
>> exclusively pander to their tastes.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311009
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to