I don't think data only goes back 130 years. I myself did a study at UNM of housing patterns following droughts in the 9th century using dendrochronological data. Ergo, the data is there, unless you want to dismiss it as not really data.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:13 PM, morgan l <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sensationalist headlines have been around as long as newspapers have been > printed. Nothing new there. > > The article clearly states how far back the data being analyzed goes, but > opponents of "global warming" won't even read that much of it, and > supporters don't care. > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/science/01/22/nasa.warmest.decade.data/index.html > > > > How the last decade can be declared 'the warmest ever on Earth' when > > we only have data dating back 130 years? > > > > This is the kind of bullshit hyperbole in the media that burns my ass. > > I hate that shit. > > > > -- > > Scott Stroz > > --------------- > > The DOM is retarded. > > > > http://xkcd.com/386/ > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311038 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
