the actual published report, once it was peer reviewed, said that there was not enough statistical evidence to link the two things together.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Dana wrote: > > I hate to interrupt when you two are having such fun but all the Times > article actually says is that the citation for the claim is from an article > that isn't peer-reviewed, right? Not that there is evidence against it. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311077 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
