I haven't been following so I don't know. Did this guy have any supporters?
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:05 PM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was watching this one closely, obviously. > > I was expecting one hell of an ugly circus, but the judge in this case did a > terrific job. He made absolutely sure that the trial would NOT become a > referendum on abortion, which of course is exactly what Roeder was hoping > would happen. > > Instead, he heard arguments from both sides, decided correctly that he could > not tell the jury to consider a lesser charge of manslaughter, the facts > were presented, they were undisputed, 37 minute deliberation, done. > > Couldn't have gone better. Kudos to the judge and the prosecutors, who > dotted all their i's and crossed all their t's on this one. I'm also > relieved that the jury did what it had to do....I was a touch worried that > an abortion nut job would make it on the jury and deadlock it.......only > takes one after all. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311396 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
