All of that privacy talk is prohibition on the GOVERNMENT against CITIZENS.
It has nothing to do with citizens' privacy from other citizens. On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:19 PM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:52 AM, LRS Scout wrote: > > > > Also the word privacy is never mentioned in the constitution, it's an > > invention of judicial activism. > > So there's something in there saying the government has the right to > invade our privacy? > > I was pretty sure that the idea was, that "we" didn't have to > enumerate all our rights, similar to this guy's take: > > http://www.harrybrowne.org/articles/PrivacyRight.htm > > A shorter version by someone else: > > Thats what the 10th Amendment is all about government is strictly > limited to doing those activities which are specifically authorized to > it by the Constitution. > > Everything else is left to the States, respectively, or to the People. > > No? > > And how does the 4th fit in there? Perhaps the 5th as well? > > :Den ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:314444 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
