Oh, changed my mind on that. Hadn't read it enough. If the westboro fags want to appeal they should cover their own costs. Hell most of them are lawyers, shouldn't cost too much.
-----Original Message----- From: Dana [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 2:45 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: _Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc one final question though -- how in the name of all that's ridiculous do you do from there to requiring the dad to pay the appeal costs? On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > quit agreeing with me or I'll have to insult reagan some more. > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:40 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Man, how did I miss this. >> >> Perfect point. The laws and rights and the constitution in the frame we are >> discussing them pertain to gov't intrusion, not that of private parties. >> >> </debate> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 2:03 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: _Speaking_of_the_Supreme_Court:_Marine's_father_ord_ere >> d_to_pay_court_costs_to_Westboro_Baptist_Churc >> >> >> All of that privacy talk is prohibition on the GOVERNMENT against CITIZENS. >> >> It has nothing to do with citizens' privacy from other citizens. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:19 PM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:52 AM, LRS Scout wrote: >>> > >>> > Also the word privacy is never mentioned in the constitution, it's an >>> > invention of judicial activism. >>> >>> So there's something in there saying the government has the right to >>> invade our privacy? >>> >>> I was pretty sure that the idea was, that "we" didn't have to >>> enumerate all our rights, similar to this guy's take: >>> >>> http://www.harrybrowne.org/articles/PrivacyRight.htm >>> >>> A shorter version by someone else: >>> >>> That's what the 10th Amendment is all about - government is strictly >>> limited to doing those activities which are specifically authorized to >>> it by the Constitution. >>> >>> Everything else is left to "the States, respectively, or to the People." >>> >>> No? >>> >>> And how does the 4th fit in there? Perhaps the 5th as well? >>> >>> :Den >> >> >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:314498 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
