THen that's bad. I really have no idea how all that goes down, I was just thinking that it made sense to include them, as you might with all parties involved.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Discussion yes. Information gathering, yes. Policy making, no. > And if you're going to include one side of the issue, you also need to > include other sides. Didn't happen in any of those cases. > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I have no stake in this, but doesn't it make sense to include oil > companies > > in a discussion about energy policy? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:314515 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
