I actually didn't read it until now. Unlike Jerry's claim that they're all abusers:
The bishops' letter raised concerns that the bill would allow claims that are 70 years or older, in which "key individuals are deceased, memories have been faded, and documents and other evidence have been lost." The letter said that the majority of cases would be driven by "trial lawyers hoping to profit from these cases." On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:24 PM, morgan l <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually, if you scroll back up to the original message, you will see that > the point is the Catholic Church is fighting the removal of the statute of > limitations for sexual abuse charges. > Who the victims or abusers are is irrelevant to the charges. The proposal > will not remove the statute of limitations for these charges only if the > abuser was a priest/clergyperson. > > To defend an institution that is actively trying to defend any and all sex > abusers is reprehensible. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:315665 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
