Fox unbiased? LOL...now I know for a fact that you are truly clueless. Eric
-----Original Message----- From: Sam [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:01 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Sarah Palin has earned 12m dollars in less than a year. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Eric Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > If they didn't read it, they shouldn't claim to have knowledge of something > that they didn't fucking read with their own eyes. That's the problem when > you follow people blindly. WTF are you even talking about? You read TPM or watched Leno's man on the street where they asked one person if the read an entire 3000 page bill that wasn't even written yet and they said no. Find me a real person complaining about Obamacare and ask them what part they are complaining about and they will tell you. Don't hide under some BS cloud of you have to read the entire bill to have a voice on any part of it. > Did Rush tell you that about Pelosi? FoxNews quoted her. Then I double checked and sure enough said it. Is that wrong that I wasn't present when she said it? >I hate top break it to you...but the > text of the House Bill was available last Spring. Then it went to the Senate, then amendments were added, then it went back to the house where they passed the Senates bill not the house bill. Then the what the reconciliation? Then that had errors so they had to change it and vote on a yet another version. Lot's of stuff like single payer was removed in the process, but crap like the mandate was removed and reinserted and made the final cut. So nothing like the bill you're claiming was posted for a year, nice try. > The Senate bill was up > over the summer. Amendments were available throughout the entire Senate > process. Just because you and your fellow teabagger Are you a homophobe? Do you think a gay slur is going to hurt the feelings of people obviously smarter and more open minded than you? BTW, I'm not a part of the tea party, I just think you spewing hate against a group of people that don't deserve it and are hear to counter argue is ridiculous. > are too fucking stupid > to find it on the senate website doesn't mean that they were not available. > Maybe if you had bothered to do the research on your own instead of only > going by wheat Rush, Glen, and Fox tell you, maybe you would have known > that. Rush and Glen are opinion, Fox is news. Why do you group tehm together. Do you only like news sources that fit your agenda? > Apparently not only didn't you read the bill but you didn't read what I > said. I said that when asked if they read it, they said no...but they HEARD > about parts of it. Get a fucking clue Sam. I know that is a bit much to > ask of a teabagger. And they aren't against the entire bill or a health care overhaul in general. Just the parts they're complaining about and this bill has lots of them. If YOU actually paid attention and watched Fox News or another unbiased news source you would know that folks in the tea part movement are all arguing over different issues. Some over medicare/medicaid changes some of the mandate, some over doctors pay but most agree the new system will tax us beyond saving. It will bankrupt our country. Bernake said as much yesterday. > I read parts of it...but I am not protesting it or claiming that I have > knowledge of a part of the bill I didn't read. That stupid as shit you accuse Rush of doing. Let's see some links to back that statement up. And I'm not talking about one liberal that infiltrated the tea party movement, I want surveys. > I am not saying that the bill > pays for illegal immigrants when it is fact states the opposite. It was in the bill than it was out BECAUSE the people spoke up. Now illegals are not eligible but now there's a big push for amnesty. Same people will be covered, they'll just need a change of status. > I am not > claiming that it creates death panels when there is no such language in the > bill. NYTimes came out with an article like a week after the bill passed backing up the entire death panel argument. They just didn't call it that but the results are the same. > I am not claiming that I will go to jail if I dont get insurance. http://www.politico.com/static/PPM110_090925_document2.html Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) received a handwritten note Thursday from Joint Committee on Taxation Chief of Staff Tom Barthold confirming the penalty for failing to pay the up to $1,900 fee for not buying health insurance. Violators could be charged with a misdemeanor and could face up to a year in jail or a $25,000 penalty, Barthold wrote on JCT letterhead. He signed it "Sincerely, Thomas A. Barthold. > That's coming from your fellow moronic teabaggers. If you are going to > protest it... I didn't realize Barthold was part of the the Tea Party movement > it would be logical that you actually read it so that you know > why you are protesting...unless of course you are just being a good little > Republican Fascist and goosestepping to whatever Rush, Glen, and Fox tell > you to do. Yo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:316054 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
