I'd need a definition for "aggressive social programs" to know if I agree. For instance, it costs $30 a night to camp at a state park, and $15 to swim (once) at the local YMCA. The only aggression I am seeing is in the pricing. I am more inclined to ponder the three-strikes-you're-out laws when I think of aggressive. There seems to be a consensus that those have failed but are politically untouchable.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: >> huh. Versus de-funding the prison system? > > I don't know how it will happen, but I don't think they will let > welfare be cut. It is interesting to see one of the most liberal > states in the US, which has some of the most aggressive social > programs, having this problem. > > One of the things In like about states doing certain things instead of > the Federal govt is that it gives the US 50 testbeds for new ideas on > a state level and lets us see which ones are worthwhile and which ones > fail. > > -Cameron > > ... > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:318624 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
