My point was why would you care if married people stayed together unless it for for the moral obligation of the family nucleus? If it's just for the benefits than I misread.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > Its an ida sam. You do know what ideas are I trust. They're things you > think of yourself instead of being fed them by your talk radio > bloviards. > > Moreover your the moral police statement implied a pronunciation of > "Person X is evil and bad!" Where have I done that, aside from your > overly fertile imagination that is. BTW you should quite trying to > feed it so much manure - less Limblob in other words. > > Insults aside the logic is simple, invert the current setup. By making > marriage more difficult to obtain, only the more committed will go for > it. The more committed you are the less likely you will be to end it. > > And btw its not my idea, but rather something I picked up from Robert > Heinlein. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:319214 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
