I know people who do not believe in evolution who support bio-engineering, so I am nto so sure why you guys think it would vanish in you biazrro world of Red and Blue states.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Eric Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just don't see how believing that life is fixed and non-changing would > allow for successful theories and practices in changing life...that would > contradict each other just a bit ;-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:36 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Thought this was great > > > I agree that bio-engineering is forced, guided evolution (a great way > to explain it,m by the way), but that is because I believe in > evolution. > > Just because someone does nto believe that we evolved from other > creatures does nto mean that they cannot see what we are made up of > and force and guide changes. > > I agree with you guys on the evolution vs. creationism thing, but to > say you cannot succeed in bio-engineering if you do not believe in > evolution is kind of short sighted and a bit arogant. > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Eric Roberts > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If evolution is false then it shouldn't be possible to genetically modify >> something to do something else. Really, all bio-engineering is, is forced >> and guided evolution. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:27 AM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: Thought this was great >> >> >> As much as I agree that creationism is pure, unadulterated bullshit, I >> am nto so sure I agree that Bio-tech would fail because evolution >> would nto be taught. >> >> I am not so sure I undertand the correlation. >> >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> the whole issue of evolution has been discussed so often here and the >>> creationist point of view has been so roundly rejected on scientific >>> grounds that I'm not going to discuss this piece of fetid manure. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Kris Sisk <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The red states - through lack of education, development in biotec >>>>> (hey >>>>> you need the theory of evolution etc to advance in it, then there's >>>>> stem cells etc.) I give it maybe 20 years and it will be another 3rd >>>>> world country ruled by the Christian Taliban. >>>> >>>> Eh, wrong on several counts there. >>>> >>>> 1) You don't need to understand how life got to the state it's in now to >> understand what it IS now. Biotech would advance just fine without it even >> in the unlikely event that evolution got taken out of those schools. >>>> >>>> 2) Conservative != Christian >>>> >>>> 3) Even if they ended up with a Christian theocracy it wouldn't be like >> the Taliban. >>>> >>>> 4) Neither side would last 20 years before they were third world >> countries. >>>> >>>> The economic ideals of extremists would take care of that in under a >> decade for BOTH groups. The conservatives would destroy their economy on >> pointless wars sold to the public as fighting terrorism when in fact the >> goal is to get more oil. The liberals would destroy thier's with welfare >> programs run rampant. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:320537 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
