Actually, I forget the name of the law, but Obama would be within his rights and powers to seize BP's American assets and take over the entire operation and use those assets to pay for the cleanup as well as pay claims. That would include selling off assets that they own to generate funds.
-----Original Message----- From: Judah McAuley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 12:26 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Need help understanding a current talking point I'm confused, who is illegally demanding to take over what process? Governments shouldn't respond to disasters? Or is this something about the escrow fund? On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Sisk, Kris <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since when has that stopped them from doing anything? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 12:14 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Need help understanding a current talking point > > > Not to mention it's illegal for the government to demand to take over > this process. > But some people love Chicago style politics. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:321404 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
