now lets see, you show excessive deference to a corporation who has
been shown to be more than negligent. You think that an officer who
has clearly violated article 88 of the UCMJ should suffer no
sanctions. What group showed a similar set of attitudes other than the
supporters of Galteri, Pinochet and Mussolini?

so where's the brown shirt and jackboots Sam. I am sure they will go
nicely with your tinfoil hat.

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> You always respond to what you think I'd write without actually
> reading what I really wrote. Are you OK? Do you need a little time to
> gather yourself?
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I guess not only are you a worshiper of corporatism but you have no
>> problem with no soldiers not deferring to civilian authority. You need
>> to google Mussolini or the Argentine and Chilean juntas.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> They might need him to stay.
>>>
>>> He's way wrong to go public but it is funny as hell how outraged the
>>> left is now but happy as pigs in shit when it happened during the last
>>> admin.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Jacob <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> McChrystal is out... White house acting like a bunch of children
>>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:321715
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to