An appeal is to determine if the findings were valid. The judge said no because they were based on a lie. Salazar says he'll re-write it so the lies are excluded and it won't have a reason to be overturned.
So what you're saying is correct, but the admin screwed up and have to redo it to say we're doing it because we can. On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Sisk, Kris <[email protected]> wrote: > > An appeal. The federal government has massive Constitutional power when > it comes to interstate commerce, which oil drilling falls under. Whether > it's right or not, they do have the legal power to put a moratorium on > it. I'd be surprised if a judge without a vested interest in the matter > would uphold the ruling. > > I was under the impression that the moratorium was motivated by fear of > another Deepwater Horizon. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:321870 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
