It could be me, but this whole 'new ball for the World Cup' thing kinda invalidates the consistency argument against having replays. How can you argue against something on the grounds of consistence when the single largest aspect of the game is so inconsistent?
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:17 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Fifa promises investigation into Jabulani ball. Lets see. The Super Bowl is the biggest event put on by the NFL. The World Cup is the biggest event (even bigger than the Super Bowl) put on by FIFA. (Apples vs Apples there) The NFL does not change the design of the ball for its big event. FIFA does. Please help me understand how this is an apples to oranges comparison? I cannot imagine training for 4 years(or more) to get to the World Cup and have to play with a ball, arguable the single most important piece of equipment in ANY soccer game, that acts differently to what I used during my training. To me, that is just...ionno...odd. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: > > But how does the fact that the NFL doesn't change their ball relate to > football in any way? It's part of world cup that they try to use new tech > with the balls. It just seems like you are comparing apples to oranges by > saying "say what you want about oranges, at least they aren't apples." > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Sure. >> >> If I understand correctly, the ball being used this year was newly >> engineered specifically for this World Cup (as was, I believe, the >> ball from 4 years ago). >> >> This ball seems to be acting differently than other balls that are >> used. You don't get that with American football (or any other major >> sport in the US). >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Would you be so kind as to help a poor fella like myself understand your >> > point? >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Say what you want about American football, but we don't re-engineer >> >> the ball for every Super Bowl :D >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Fifa responds to another point of contention in the worldcup today : >> The >> >> new >> >> > Ball. >> >> > >> >> > The ball has come under intense criticism for it's propensity to arc >> >> several >> >> > meters into the air with the slightest touch. >> >> > This has thrown off several strikers who in regular play are normally >> top >> >> > scorers. It is also supposedly responsible for the low goal scoring in >> >> > several of the matches thus far. >> >> > The number of overbars and wide strikes in this Worldcup is supposedly >> >> > higher than on previous years. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> http://www.wired.com/playbook/2010/06/fifa-promises-investigation-into-w orld-cup-ball/ >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322247 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
