Whatever mate. You are forging an argument about a sport you know nothing
about based on a tagline you know nothing about. FIFA agreed to investigate.
Big deal. That agreement to look into the ball design doesn't disagree with
a single point I've made. Full stop.


On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> You can defend it anyway you want..but FIFA does not even agree with
> you or they would not be investigating the ball design - unless, of
> course, this is just FIFA trying to make it seem like they really
> care.
>
> The Super Bowl may be a 'league cup' but tons of people the world over
> watch the game every year. I think on that alone, yo can put it right
> beside the World Cup in terms of viewer interest. Not sure you get as
> much international coverage of the EPL championship as you do for the
> Super Bowl.
>
> FYI - I never said the NFL was superior. My exact words were 'Say what
> you want about American football, but we don't re-engineer
> the ball for every Super Bowl'. Each has it own plusses and minuses -
> just in my opinion football has more pluses and soccer has more
> minuses.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Super Bowl is not at all like World Cup.
> >
> > Super Bowl is a league cup. It's like winning the Premier League.
> > Super Bowl isn't international, it's a country-wide league. NFL is like
> the
> > EPL or SPL or Serie A.
> >
> > Yes there are comparisons, but an equal amount of comparisons can be
> drawn
> > to any competition. So piping up in the middle of a discussion about
> World
> > Cup with some comment about how the NFL doesn't change the ball is as
> > ludicrous as it is benign. You might as well have posted about red
> > Life-Savers.
> >
> > As far as the ball goes, they didn't change the tech for money. They make
> > their money off the design. The balls that incorporate the actual tech
> are
> > usually over $100. The majority of the balls sold are the $30 ones which
> are
> > regular balls with the latest design. They change the tech because they
> are
> > trying to progress football. The same as every other sport tries to
> > progress. Sports change padding, shoes, skates, sticks, gloves, balls and
> > every other aspect of equipment to keep making the sport faster and more
> > intense. Every sport does it. And players complain about the ball every
> > world cup. It's as sure as death and taxes. If you actually want to know
> the
> > engineering decisions that go into it read this:
> >
> http://www.canadianmanufacturing.com/designengineering/features/designapplications/article.jsp?content=20100614_132645_9292&page=1
> >
> > Somehow trying to say NFL is superior because they don't change the ball
> is
> > ridiculous.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Umm..no its not.
> >>
> >> I think it is a very fair comparison between football and soccer.
> >>
> >> Football is the most popular sport in the US.
> >> Soccer is the most popular sport world wide.
> >>
> >> The Super Bowl typically has the largest TV ratings for any other
> >> broadcast in a given year - except maybe on years where the World Cup
> >> is played.
> >> I cannot even begin to imagine the global ratings for the World Cup.
> >>
> >> Each event is broadcast across the globe in who knows ow many languages.
> >>
> >> Hell, they even share the number of players on the field for each side.
> >>
> >> So, I do not see how you can call this an apples vs oranges comparison.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Now you are starting to get it... that your comparison between the two
> is
> >> as
> >> > ridiculous as a comparison between rock-paper-scissors.
> >> > </cfroadmap>
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I have not changed ny argument, though you seem to be throwing up a
> >> >> lot of smoke in front of yours.
> >> >>
> >> >> I made a rather innocuous comment (intended to be a joke AND rustle
> >> >> some feathers) that the NFL does not make it a habit of redesigning
> >> >> the ball they use for their biggest event like FIFA does.
> >> >>
> >> >> You were the one who threw in the other sports (most of which are not
> >> >> relevant, rock-paper-scissors? seriously?)
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You are changing your argument mid swing. You said it was apples to
> >> >> apples
> >> >> > because NFL has Super Bowl and because FIFA has World Cup.
> Therefore
> >> the
> >> >> > list I gave speaks to that point. Now you are saying your argument
> is
> >> >> based
> >> >> > on if a ruling body is responsible for a sanctioned ball etc. I'm
> not
> >> >> going
> >> >> > to debate when you insist on losing the plot.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Funny, as it seems FIFA disagrees with you. Why else woud they be
> >> >> >> investigating, or did you not read the link that was provided?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> To address your comment below:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Darts - don't know much about it, but the few local tournaments
> (in
> >> >> >> bars) I have seen, each participant brought their own darts.
> >> >> >> Golf - Each golfer uses their own style ball, so they switch at
> their
> >> >> >> own choosing, not because the PGA decides to sell the rights to
> the
> >> >> >> new design.
> >> >> >> Rock-paper-scissors - the only equipment is your hand, so unless
> >> >> >> people start re-designing their hands, not sure this has any
> >> >> >> relevance.
> >> >> >> Tennis - I know less about tennis than I do darts. But I do not
> ever
> >> >> >> recall hearing players express concerns about the balls at any of
> the
> >> >> >> 4 majors.
> >> >> >> Cricket - ok..I know nothing of Cricket. Absolutely nothing. So
> you
> >> >> >> may have a point here..its doubtful, but I will concede this one.
> >> >> >> Horse racing - seriously?
> >> >> >> Indy - if its anything like NASCAR, they use different tires for
> each
> >> >> >> race - something else I find stupid and dangerous. But aside from
> >> that
> >> >> >> each team supplies it own car, so if they changes anything, its
> their
> >> >> >> fault, not the sanctioning body.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Medic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > So then darts, golf, paper-rock-scissors, tennis, cricket, horse
> >> >> racing,
> >> >> >> > indy and more are all apples to apples just because they have a
> >> >> >> > large pinnacle event?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > It's not like they've changed the ball so much that it's not a
> >> >> football
> >> >> >> > anymore. And it's not like the teams were just given the ball
> the
> >> day
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> > world cup started. They've had lots of time to train with
> Jubulani.
> >> >> And
> >> >> >> > these athletes can and have adjusted to the ball. This hasn't
> >> >> destroyed
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> > world cup nor taken any of the shine off of it. Look at Portugal
> >> >> scoring
> >> >> >> > seven goals in a single outing. Proof positive that changing the
> >> ball
> >> >> >> hasn't
> >> >> >> > destroyed the game.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > So yes, apples to oranges. And again, why the hell does it
> matter
> >> what
> >> >> >> NFL
> >> >> >> > does in a discussion about the world cup?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Lets see.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The Super Bowl is the biggest event put on by the NFL. The
> World
> >> Cup
> >> >> >> >> is the biggest event (even bigger than the Super Bowl) put on
> by
> >> >> FIFA.
> >> >> >> >> (Apples vs Apples there)
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The NFL does not change the design of the ball for its big
> event.
> >> >> FIFA
> >> >> >> >> does.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Please help me understand how this is an apples to oranges
> >> >> comparison?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> I cannot imagine training for 4 years(or more) to get to the
> World
> >> >> Cup
> >> >> >> >> and have to play with a ball, arguable the single most
> important
> >> >> piece
> >> >> >> >> of equipment in ANY soccer game, that acts differently to what
> I
> >> used
> >> >> >> >> during my training. To me, that is just...ionno...odd.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Medic <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > But how does the fact that the NFL doesn't change their ball
> >> relate
> >> >> to
> >> >> >> >> > football in any way? It's part of world cup that they try to
> use
> >> >> new
> >> >> >> tech
> >> >> >> >> > with the balls. It just seems like you are comparing apples
> to
> >> >> oranges
> >> >> >> by
> >> >> >> >> > saying "say what you want about oranges, at least they aren't
> >> >> apples."
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Scott Stroz <
> [email protected]
> >> >
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Sure.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> If I understand correctly, the ball being used this year was
> >> newly
> >> >> >> >> >> engineered specifically for this World Cup (as was, I
> believe,
> >> the
> >> >> >> >> >> ball from 4 years ago).
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> This ball seems to be acting differently than other balls
> that
> >> are
> >> >> >> >> >> used. You don't get that with American football (or any
> other
> >> >> major
> >> >> >> >> >> sport in the US).
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Medic <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > Would you be so kind as to help a poor fella like myself
> >> >> understand
> >> >> >> >> your
> >> >> >> >> >> > point?
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Scott Stroz <
> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Say what you want about American football, but we don't
> >> >> >> re-engineer
> >> >> >> >> >> >> the ball for every Super Bowl :D
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Vivec <
> [email protected]>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Fifa responds to another point of contention in the
> >> worldcup
> >> >> >> today
> >> >> >> >> :
> >> >> >> >> >> The
> >> >> >> >> >> >> new
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Ball.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The ball has come under intense criticism for it's
> >> propensity
> >> >> to
> >> >> >> >> arc
> >> >> >> >> >> >> several
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > meters into the air with the slightest touch.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > This has thrown off several strikers who in regular
> play
> >> are
> >> >> >> >> normally
> >> >> >> >> >> top
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > scorers. It is also supposedly responsible for the low
> >> goal
> >> >> >> scoring
> >> >> >> >> in
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > several of the matches thus far.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The number of overbars and wide strikes in this
> Worldcup
> >> is
> >> >> >> >> supposedly
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > higher than on previous years.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.wired.com/playbook/2010/06/fifa-promises-investigation-into-world-cup-ball/
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322279
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to