IIRC, the biggest gun they tested was a .50 caliber rifle.

I do not have to fire a gun to know that any bullets it shoots cannot
defy the laws of physics.

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Eric Roberts
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Again...you obviously have never fired an m1911.  The force the round exudes
> when it hits a target is pretty intense.  I don’t know what weapons they
> tested on Mythbusters (I would certainly like to see the episode), but they
> obviously didn't test the m1911.  When you fire it, it has a pretty hard
> kick that causes your hands to go back and the gun to go up.  That is one of
> the several reasons why it is so accurate because you have to totally re-aim
> for the next shot.  Part of it is also because the round is so huge.  It is
> pretty useless at a distance, but close range, it packs a punch.  Id don’t
> know if any of the other vets here used it as I think they are all much
> younger than me and probably would have used the 9mm handgun the military
> adopted.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 9:19 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> Had to look it up, could not think of the reference at the time that
> proves this is physically imposible, its Newton's Third Law of Motion
>
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> OK, earlier you said it it would 'knock him back a few feet'...that is
>> physically impossible, without the shooter also getting knocked back a
>> few feet. 'knock them on their ass' is quite a bit different than
>> 'knock him back a few feet'. :D
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Eric Roberts
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I guess you have never fired an m1911...it's doesn't knock you back at
> all.
>>> The army adopted the handgun during the Philippine Insurrection when the
>>> Philippine Moros, who were hopped up on drugs, would keep on charging
> when
>>> hit by the revolvers that were previously used.  The .45 cal round that
> the
>>> m1911 fired hit them and knocked them on their ass so they wouldn't get
> back
>>> up.  The handgun was used up until the late 80's/early 90's when it was
>>> replaced by the much less powerful (and more accurate at greater
> distances)
>>> 9mm.
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 7:21 AM
>>> To: cf-community
>>> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>>>
>>>
>>> Any weapon that will knock the bad guy back a few feet will also knock
>>> you back a few feet. I know this because I saw it in Mythbusters. :D
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Eric Roberts
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If I were to have a firearm for self defense, I'll take the m1911 any
> day.
>>>> Screw the little 9mm handguns...I want something that would not only
> kill
>>> my
>>>> opponent, but knock him back a few feet ;-)  Which is one of the reasons
> I
>>>> won't own one. I wasn't trained to injure.  I was trained to shoot to
> kill
>>>> (one shot one kill as the saying went) and I really don't want to be put
>>> in
>>>> that situation.  I'll give my opponent a fighting chance and stick to
>>> blades
>>>> ;-)
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Robert Munn [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 1:49 AM
>>>> To: cf-community
>>>> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I could go for either of those, or maybe the M4 shotgun.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've got the Remington 870 Express.
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have a Benelli SuperNova tactical shotgun.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322857
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to