That would be assuming they are interested in the facts. -----Original Message----- From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:09 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: What's going on at the DOJ?
"Your source quote conflated the New Black Panther party with the Black Panthers. The Black Panthers have name recognition. The New Black Panther party does not. To conflate the two is patently dishonest and self serving. I pointed out that they are utterly different entities and that the Black Panthers disavow and condemn the New Black Panther party. Since your source dishonestly conflates the two, I felt it was worth while to distinguish the two. And I do not ignore the overall issue, I go right into it as you can tell by the fact that you address my criticism of the main issue." Whatever. If you think people who subscribe to this list would honestly think it is the "old" Black Panthers versus the "new" Black Panthers go right ahead. Anyone who can type DOJ and Black Panthers in a search field can find the facts quickly enough. "There we disagree." Not unusual. "Even the Bush DOJ, which was patently one of the most political in recent history, According to whom? "couldn't make a criminal case out of it even though they desperately wanted to." So what? There was still a civil case. "You don't care?" No, I do not care that the Bush DOJ downgraded the case. " Fine, that is your choice and you are putting on blinders. Be my guest." Hello Mr. Pot, you're black too. "What the fuck? I did not put out anything that is not a fact." Great. I am gad that you didn't put anything out that was not a fact. "The complainant in the case is a Republican operative who is not a voter in that district. " The dreaded "R" word so it all must untrue. Plus, contrary to contemporary knowledge, the Republicans were the civil rights party so calling someone filing a civil rights case Republican isn't exactly bad. The actual plaintiff was the United States of America<http://www.justice.gov/crt/voting/misc/philadelphia_bpp_comp.php>. Since this is a civil rights and voting issue, the United States should bring the case. It is not necessary for a voter in the district to file the case and there actually good reason why they should not. One reason is there is a group going around threatening to kill cracka's and threatening blacks who date cracka's. "I'm quite sure that if there were any voters in the district who were at the polling place and complained that they were intimidated that the DOJ would pursue the case." Oh, Judah's quite sure so it must be true. That and a dollar will buy you a double cheeseburger at Burger King. There are sworn testimonies by witnesses in a case that was being pursued. No need to file their own case and good reasons not to. "As I mentioned, the SPLC designates the New Black Panther party as a hate group. Everyone would like to see these guys asses kicked to the curb with perhaps the exception of a couple of black supremacists." And maybe the NAACP. They have condemned the tea parties as racist, but somehow haven't gotten around to the NBP's yet. The condemnation will happen though since some black tea party members have taken issue with the statement. They'll need to back track and deflect the issues. "Sounds like something worth inquiring about. Looks like Rep. Wolf from Virginia has asked Holder further about the matter. The DOJ spokesperson has responded. I suspect that we'll see a more personal response from Holder to Wolf soon." Damn, that sounds familiar. Maybe it's similar to what I said in my first post: "I don't know if Shabazz and Jackson are guilty. It certainly looks like there is enough evidence to support a trial so that a jury or judge could decide." "The case was won and ready for sentencing in May 2009 when it was suddenly dismissed for no given reason." Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner. J - Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds. - Senator Robert Byrd (the conscience of the Senate) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:323147 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
