I respectfully disagree. A human life in which a decent quality of living can be maintained is priceless.
This decision makes sense if the drug keeps them alive but bedridden, but if they're able to go about their life for a couple years and just have to take a pill or two every day and are willing to pay $8000 a month for the ability to live that much longer does the FDA really have the right to say "Sorry, you can't take this pill that can keep you alive because it's too expensive"? Personally I don't think so. -----Original Message----- From: G Money [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 2:30 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: and so it begins What's the success? I'm assuming it doesn't cure the cancer, right? So are we talking a few more weeks, months....years? Again, this is why they are WEIGHING the benefits vs. the costs. So should they? Yes. We hate to admit this, but there is a limit to how much one human life costs per second. -- No matter how close to yours another's steps have grown In the end there is one dance you'll do alone ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:325160 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
