My basic issue with Social Security is that it was not intended as
gold-plated retirement plan. If we just go back to providing benefits
to people starting at average life expectancy age, the program will
stay solvent forever and will not require ridiculous tax increases to
pay for.

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> An excellent, succinct, analysis by Krugman on the problems and lack
> there of with the Social Security program.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/16/opinion/16krugman.html?_r=2&src=twt&twt=NytimesKrugman
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:325187
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to