Seems you got caught up in a three year old April Fools joke: http://www.snopes.com/religion/pi.asp
I think the question was mentioning God in science so I assume it's the creationism argument. As long as evolution is taught and creationism only covers the creation part that evolution doesn't than the harm will be minimal and easily removed during the next congress. That's not saying I'm supporting it, I'm saying I would accept that temporarily if it meant the economy would recover. On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > You surely have jumped the shark on this one this week. (Hey the week > isn't over yet you can up yourself if you try a bit harder). > > So you have no problem with infusing religion into science classes? > Whose religion? Which myths are you going to allow? > > As for no harrm, here's an example, in the bible, pi is considered to > be 3. Are you willing to fly in an aircraft based on that? > > Another example, the bible talks of demons as being the source of many > illnesses. Are you willing to let your health be dependent on such? > > I could go on but even though I doubt you get the point I think others will. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:326110 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
