I left it out because it wasn't applicable to the discussion. -----Original Message----- From: Sam [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 1:50 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: how do they come up with this crud?
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Eric Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hitler was never a socialist. > Ian Kershaw[148] Not purely, he was way more socialist than right wing. > Bastard movements like the National Socialism (Nazism) of twentieth-century > Germany and Austria , save for the bare fact that they enforced central > control of social policy, had nothing of socialism in them. > Margaret Cole,[149] under Socialism, in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy A defender of socialism taking distance. > Stalinism is a pathology of socialism, Hitlerism being the apposite example > for capitalism. > Robert Heilbroner,[150] popular socialist author, 1980 Same > If there is one thing all Fascists and National Socialists agreed on, it > was their hostility to capitalism. > Eugen Weber,[151] historian of fascism You left out one: http://www.stephenhicks.org/tag/bertrand-russell-on-hitler/ [A]nti-Semitism was rife in almost all varieties of socialism. Sidney Hook,[152] socialist philosopher > It is significant that the most important ancestors of National > SocialismFichte, Rodbertus, and Lassalleare at the same time acknowledged > fathers of socialism. > F. A. Hayek,[153] 1944 Not sure why you added that. If you read the rest of your footnotes it pretty much sums up he was a socialist but the other socialists are sa ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:326321 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
