At the same time the interviewer did not ask any loaded questions etc. It was straight socratic style questioning. He let those being interviewed demonstrate their own idiocy.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:45 AM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Here's some interviews with some of the tea bagging party members at >> the Beck rally. Really are these people serious? You really have to >> wonder. >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ht8PmEjxUfg&feature=player_embedded >> > > Listen...i hate the Tea Party...i really do. And i'm sure that, as a group, > they probably have a higher-than-usual count of idiots. But give me any > large group of people and a microphone, and I can find a few of the worst of > the worst, and give you a handful of interviews that will paint the entire > group as a bunch of rubes. > > This is a tactic that I'm kind of getting tired of...even if the individual > interviews are kind of funny (it's always fun to laugh at idiots), the over > all premise is kind of insulting: that I'm dumb enough to take a small, hand > selected sampling, and let an interviewer use that to sway my opinions. > > -- > No matter how close to yours another's steps have grown > In the end there is one dance you'll do alone > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:326710 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
