On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think that the problem there is that you don't mention any > counter-balancing interests. I guess I don't think I should have to every single time I post. > When you say "tailored with the interests > of business" and don't mention any other interests people can assume > that you mean no regulation because that would be what a lot of > business interests want. > I grow tired of having to constantly clarify that "some" does not mean "all", or that if I suggest "X", it doesn't mean at the total expense of "Y". It's a lazy form of debate, that happens here a lot unfortunately. Sam practically lives by this method. -- Glittering prizes and endless compromises Shatter the illusion of integrity ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:327993 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
