I'm convinced you think I'm as crazy as I know you to be.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:44 PM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Sam wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:45 AM, denstar wrote: >>> >>> Not as pissed as I was when Bush blew through our savings (first time >>> we'd been in the green in my lifetime, as I recall-- I think my folks >>> handed me debt, the bastards!). >> >> It's a shame Bush had to waste all your money after 9/11, shame on him. >> You do realize the budget was deficit was nearly flush when the >> socialist banking crisis hit. Too bad he didn't try harder to stop the >> democrats. > > Socialist banking crisis?!? You are a barrel of laughs! > > FWIW, I don't really think of it as "my" money so much. I choose how > to spend it and whatnot, but I wouldn't have it if it weren't for a > lot of other folks. It's like an ecosystem. > > I'm so freaking scared of socialists! They're like, everywhere! And > they're like the Nazis, too! Ahhhhhhhh! > > Like that famous poem, "First, they came for the Jews..." *snort* > >> Also, when Clinton borrowed from the SS fund, he promised to pay it >> back with the next ten years of future tax revenue. That included the >> dotcom bubble, 9/11 and the banking crisis. Methinks you were duped >> into thinking you were in the green. > > Sometimes, appearance is as real as is needed. Most of our financial > ecosystem is based on appearance and emotion, versus substance and > logic. > > You must be very happy the "illusion" of being in the green was > finally revealed to us by Bush. Like, right away, too. > > Cutting taxes and increasing spending is good, right? It's like, > counter-intuitive, but it actually makes the government *more* money > than it would make by going the intuitive route. Honest. You just > need to give the theory more time to work-- or, wait, you're saying it > /did/ work, right? But then the evil socialist liberal fascists > wrecked it! > > Those /bastards/! We were so close! > >>> The same folks railing against this stuff are the ones who rail >>> against environmental regulation (zing!), and here we are talking >>> about how awful it is to be leaving a fictitional (heh) problem >>> (meaning Money, which is pretty "fake" these days) for them? >> >> You want to close all the factories in the odd chance it might add to >> global warming and you think tax revenue won't be effected? > > Global warming? Dude, you're sorta stuck on that neh? It's in your craw. > > I guess you think that, for example, the Haliburton Loophole is fine > and dandy, eh? You don't mind poisoning your own people (including > children) for the sake of Big Business? Because they'll spend that > money, and it will trickle down to you and I? 'Cause they'll invest > it wisely? (hello financial crisis) > > Heck, I'd trade the children for a grip of cash! Who wouldn't?!? > >>> I think I was paying for Regan when I started out... hrm. If I had to >>> have my children paying for something I wanted, yes, I would much >>> rather have them paying for "great society" projects than weapons and >>> S&L crap (a recurring theme!). >> >> I'm sure it upset you that we won against the USSR, they were such a fun >> rival. >> Being a superpower is so overrated, let the UN handle all the world >> conflicts. They rock > > They were a fun rival. I was all like, "oh yeah, Russia!" when I > watched those old SG-1 episodes. If we could get the KGB going again, > a lot of old movies and tv shows ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:328593 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
