In my mind, compromise is not necessarily one side agreeing with the other, its taking the best of both solutions and creating a better solution.
To today's politicians, 'compromise' means 'putting up a huge stink until the other side agrees with me'. Sadly, neither side has the ability to think that the other side may actually have a good idea. On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Sisk, Kris <[email protected]> wrote: > > They share an inability to compromise and an inability to have a > respectful and truthful debate. With those similarities their > differences don't matter. Until politicians on the extremes and the > people who support them learn those skills we're pretty well doomed to > bounce from one extreme to the other. > > -----Original Message----- > From: denstar [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 11:02 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: The real reason for unemployment > > > Both sides may share similar aspects, but it's a fallacy to think that > they are the same. > > :Den > > -- > Mystical explanations are thought to be deep; the truth is that they > are not even shallow. > Friedrich Nietzsche > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:328766 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
