2 words: Amendment process. On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> No the one where the candidate had to personally endorse the ads. > > You mean CEO's would have to appear in ads they fund. But the unions > are all exempt from even disclosing they funded it. > > >> Silly me it wasn't a Republican bill so its automatically a threat to >> free speech. > > http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2010/06/house-passes-campaign-disclosure-rules/1 > > The legislation was crafted in response to a January ruling by the > Supreme Court that cleared the way for unlimited spending by > corporations and unions on campaign ads that oppose or support > candidates. > > > >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The bill that tries to override the Supreme courts decision on free speech? >>> >>> Weren't unions exempt from that bill? Why is that? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Just a simple comment Sam, the disclosure law that was before the >>>> senate recently was filibustered by the Republican party. What are >>>> they trying to hide. >>> >>> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:328787 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
