NO its not. And your so called outrage is very disingenuous. Its very relevant to the issue. When a drug is approved for testing by the FDA, the protocols are very strict.
As for the rest of it, well I would like to remind you that the US stopped development of biowarefare reagents long before other nations. Now the focus is on defensive measures such as prevention and detection. Moreover many of these nations were far more brutal in their testing - yet I notice that you are not whining about. Gee I wonder why? A bit of bigotry on your part perhaps? On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm certainly against people being infected with deadly diseases and being > exposed to chemical and biological weapons in the name of medicine. > > Your question is irrelevant to the topic at hand, which is not about people > receiving medical treatment. > > On 8 October 2010 08:52, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Not really. the studies have to be approved by the institutional >> review boards before the experiments are conducted. So unless there is >> really strong justification nothing really harmful can be done. >> Moreover the subject have to be guaranteed treatment of whatever >> condition is being treated after the study is over. so at the very >> least the subjects get treatment that they ordinarily would not be >> receiving or could not afford. >> >> So are you against people receiving medical treatment? >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:328873 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
