I imagine he does, though the point of that one was to replace a monarchy and implement a representative democracy. If you have to violently overthrow a representative democracy that would mean that either 1) it is no longer a representative democracy or 2) you are just a little shit that can't convince others to bring about a government you like any other way than threatening them with guns.
I'm sure that he thinks that it is number 1. I would suggest that number 2 is more likely. Judah On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does he mean a 'violent overthrow of the government' like the one that > happened here in the late 1700's? You know the one - the one that > actually formed this country? > > :D > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Republican Congressional candidate Stephen Broden, a Dallas minister >> with a history of making controversial statements, admitted in an >> interview on Thursday that he would not rule out a violent overthrow >> of the government if the November 2 elections did not produce a change >> in leadership. >> >> "The option is on the table. I don't think that we should ever remove >> anything from the table as it relates to our liberties and our >> freedoms," Broden said, in an interview on Dallas-Fort Worth's >> WFAA-TV. He added, however, that "it is not the first option." >> >> http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20020479-503544.html >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:329796 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
