Heh. "Go work with at-risk kids! Stem the problem..." was cool.
She's all like, "I adopted!". Wonder if she can't have biological kids, and is pissed at those that can, yet have abortions. Which is understandable, in a selfish kind of way. Like the story my buddy Dan told me about shaving his head, and having some dude roll up and start lambasting him about being a skinhead-- he tells the dude "I have cancer you fuck!" (he didn't, but he wasn't a skin neither). Guy got all apoplecticly apologetic. Heh. "Righteous" comes to mind. Bellowing hatred while holding a sign of Jesus? *shakes head* I hope I'm never as famous as JC! :Den -- What hadn't been realized in the literature until now is that merely to describe how severely something has been tested in the past itself embodies inductive assumptions, even as a statement about the past. Robert Nozick On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > I'm impressed:: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEFWDYB0rWo&feature=player_embedded > > -- > People need to realize that the plural of anecdote is not data. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330264 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
