Just did that and the numbers are better...but not 'landslide'
territory - and the Republican candidate is still on top in House, but
the Mountain Party Candidate was most similar for Senate.

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:25 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> So, I went to this web site, http://www.votesmart.org/voteeasy to get
>> a better idea of where my Senate and House candidates match up with my
>> ideals.
>
> Slick interface, like the concept!
>
>> Sadly, when I was done, the closest any candidate, for either office,
>> came was 47%. 47 fucking percent. That means that no matter who I vote
>> for I agree with them on less than half of the 'major' issues.
>>
>> That sucks.
>
> If you start over and only select answers for items that are "most
> important" for you, how do the candidates stack up?
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:330744
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to