My point is that is not what they are protesting...they already agreed to those concessions. They are protesting the removal of collective bargaining rights. So there is no hypocrisy...his comparison of the situation was incorrect. If they were protesting having to pay more for benefits, then he would be dead on.
Eric -----Original Message----- From: Medic [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 18:19 To: cf-community Subject: Re: Walker, Wisconson Lier Well I care enough. E, Cam is just pointing out the irony in the fact that the unions complain about the gov taking money from it's employees to invest and return, whereas unions automatically take dues with no intention of investing or returning it to the user base. It's a comment on the apparent hypocrisy. More of an aside than an interjection on the topic. Now, where did I put my drive-by sarcasm? On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Eric Roberts > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I still don't see what this has to do with anything. > > I know. It's okay. I don't care enough to explain it to you. > > -Cameron > > ... > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:334761 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
