Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd also like to point out, once again, that the numbers used in > Ryan's proposal are extraordinarily out of far right field.
I get your point, I just think it's irrelevant. Basically what Ryan did was say, "we can fix our books by attacking entitlements. Here's the outline of a plan to show that it could be done. Unless you've got something better, we're going down this path." Then Obama said, "I do have something better, here's an outline of plan that fixes the books while preserving entitlements" And that's where we are. Getting all huffy over the details at this point is a bit silly. It's like worrying about what restaurant you're to eat at in the airport before you decide if you're going to Asia or Europe. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:336353 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
