At one point they blacked out the pictures but with better technology they
photoshopped the people out. I guess the first is ok, but the second not.
The curse of technology.
Personally, I'd like to have read the original article to see if there was
clear deception or not. Did they say Clinton was there or not? What was
actually said. If the picture didn't show Clinton but the article said she
was there then any accusation of deception goes out the window. But I didn't
see the original and I my understanding of Yiddish is limited at best. Maybe
my mother-in-law can find a copy somewhere and translate it for me. I'll
send her the article as it stands to see what the caption says.

When a picture has a cation and context, the entire caption and context has
to be preserved or else the picture loses the related meaning. CNN should
have presented the caption in full translation.

A big blue dot over them would have been fine to follow their apparent
> rules. Photoshopping them out so it appears that they were not there
> is NOT acceptable from a news organization.
>
> Or so it seems to me.
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Michael Dinowitz
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > If you read the article you'll see that the paper is from a group that
> does
> > not print pictures of women. While editing the photo was not right it was
> > not part of a sinister cover-up. And they owned up to it and apologized.
> > Basically a slow news day non-story.
> >
> > This is, of course, besides the fact that the photo is far from iconic.
> So
> > Clinton gasped when the operation was going down. So Obama was leaning in
> > watching. It's iconic because we're told it is, not because it actually
> > caries any weight.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:337586
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to