While still sexist, preventing is different from actually removing... Blacking out would at least acknowledge they were there, though I would still think it was sexist and really asinine.
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 08:51 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Brooklyn-based Hasidic newspaper cuts Clinton, other woman from iconic photo So if they just blacked out the women you would not see them as sexist assholes? Only because they photoshopped them out? (a rather easy thing to do now-a-days) Just wanted to be sure the border of sexist asshole by your standards. Does it apply to anyone who would remove or otherwise prevent the display of a woman in their newspaper? (be careful answering this one as it covers a lot of cultures who would normally be exempt from the label). On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Eric Roberts < [email protected]> wrote: > > If they are going to the trouble of censoring, it would have been the > intelligent (and less expensive/time consuming)thing to do, rather > than going with the sexist asshole option. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:337666 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
