On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > The AG that Bush fired tried to make a case and could not find a case > that could honestly be made. He said so and whoops, got fired, > allegedly for other reasons. I refer you to the Inspector-General's > report I cited earlier and which you do not appear to have read. This > is now historical fact, dude. Get over it.
The AG that Bush hired and then let go after five years was too busy to be bothered with a voter fraud case. There was no investigations of the original fraud that caused him to state that there was a voter fraud problem. > That said, the New Mexico case is the only one I followed in detail -- > I was involved, if tangentially -- so I don't really know anything > about the other allegations. > >> 2) Some commentator didn't get all the FOIA info he asked for in a >> timely manner. > > It wasn't FOIA, it was established procedure under state law. And > he's not "some commentator" -- he's a well-respected journalist with a > track record. It was and any blogger with your stamp of approval must be a pure moonbat. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:339366 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
