Never heard of him.

Does this mean any climate change non-denier scientist making money
from green companies are disqualified?


.


On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Larry Lyons <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jun/28/climate-change-sceptic-willie-soon
>
> Climate sceptic Willie Soon received $1m from oil companies, papers show
> John Vidal, environment editor
> guardian.co.uk,  Tuesday 28 June 2011 18.37 BST
>
> Documents obtained by Greenpeace show prominent opponent of climate change 
> was funded by ExxonMobil, among others
>
> One of the world's most prominent scientific figures to be sceptical about 
> climate change has admitted to being paid more than $1m in the past decade by 
> major US oil and coal companies.
>
> Dr Willie Soon, an astrophysicist at the Solar, Stellar and Planetary 
> Sciences Division of the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics, is 
> known for his view that global warming and the melting of the arctic sea ice 
> is caused by solar variation rather than human-caused CO2 emissions, and that 
> polar bears are not primarily threatened by climate change.
>
> But according to a Greenpeace US investigation, he has been heavily funded by 
> coal and oil industry interests since 2001, receiving money from ExxonMobil, 
> the American Petroleum Insitute and Koch Industries along with Southern, one 
> of the world's largest coal-burning utility companies. Since 2002, it is 
> alleged, every new grant he has received has been from either oil or coal 
> interests.
>
> In addition, freedom of information documents suggest that Soon corresponded 
> in 2003 with other prominent climate sceptics to try to weaken a major 
> assessment of global warming being conducted by the UN's leading climate 
> science body, the Nobel prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate 
> Change..
>
> Soon, who had previously disclosed corporate funding he received in the 
> 1990s, was today reportely unapologetic, telling Reuters that he agreed that 
> he had received money from all of the groups and companies named in the 
> report but denied that any group would have influenced his studies.
>
> "I have never been motivated by financial reward in any of my scientific 
> research," he said. "I would have accepted money from Greenpeace if they had 
> offered it to do my research." He did not respond to a request from the 
> Guardian to comment.
>
> Documents provided to Greenpeace by the Smithsonian under the US Freedom of 
> Information Act (FoIA) show that the Charles G Koch Foundation, a leading 
> provider of funds for climate sceptic groups, gave Soon two grants totalling 
> $175,000 (then roughly £102,000) in 2005/6 and again in 2010. In addition the 
> American Petroleum insitute (API), which represents the US petroleum and 
> natural gas industries, gave him multiple grants between 2001 and 2007 
> totalling $274,000, oil company Exxon Mobil provided $335,000 between 2005 
> and 2010, and Soon received other grants from coal and oil industry sources 
> including the Mobil Foundation, the Texaco Foundation and the Electric Power 
> Research Institute.
>
> As one of very few scientists to publish in peer-reviewed literature denying 
> climate change, Soon is widely regarded as one of the leading sceptical 
> voices. His scientific position and the vehemence of his views has made him a 
> central figure in a heated political debate that has informed the US right 
> wing and helped to undermine public trust in the science of global warming 
> and UN negotiations.
>
> "A campaign of climate change denial has been waged for over 20 years by big 
> oil and big coal," said Kert Davies, a research director at Greenpeace US.. 
> "Scientists like Dr Soon, who take fossil fuel money and pretend to be 
> independent scientists, are pawns."
>
> Soon has strongly argued that the 20th century was not a uniquely extreme 
> climatic period. His most famous work challenged the "hockey stick" graph of 
> temperature records published by Michael Mann, which showed a relatively 
> sharp rise in temperatures during the second half of the 20th century. A 
> paper published with Sallie Baliunas in 2003 in the journal Climate Research 
> which attacked the hockey stick on flimsy evidence led to a group of leading 
> climate scientists including Mann deciding to boycott the journal. In a 
> letter to the Guardian in February 2004, Soon wrote that the authors had been 
> open about their sources of funding. "All sources of funding for our research 
> were fully disclosed in our manuscript. Most of our funding came from federal 
> agencies, including the Air Force Office of Scientific Research and Nasa," he 
> wrote.
>
> He has also questioned the health risks of mercury emissions from coal and in 
> 2007 co-wrote a paper that down-played the idea that polar bears are 
> threatened by human-caused climate change
>
> The investigation is likely to embarrass Exxon, the world's largest oil 
> company, which for many years funded climate sceptics but in 2008 declared it 
> would cut funds to lobby groups that "divert attention" from the need to find 
> new sources of clean energy. According to the documents, Exxon provided 
> $55,000 for Soon to study Arctic climate change in 2007 and 2008, and another 
> $76,106 for research into solar variability between 2008 and 2010.
>
> Exxon spokesman Alan Jeffers said this week the company did not fund Soon 
> last year, and that it funds hundreds of organisations to do research on 
> climate and the environment.
>
> Southern gave Soon $120,000 starting in 2008 to study the Sun's relation to 
> climate change, according to the FIA documents. Spokeswoman Stephanie Kirijan 
> said the company has spent about $500m on funding environmental research and 
> development ,and that it did not fund Soon last year.
>
> In one 2003 email released to Greenpeace, that Soon sent, it is believed, to 
> four other leading sceptics, he writes: "Clearly [the fourth assessment 
> report] chapters may be too much for any one of us to tackle them all ... But 
> as a team, we may give it our best shot to try to anticipate and counter some 
> of the chapters ..." He adds: "I hope we can ... see what we can do to weaken 
> the fourth assessment report."
>
> In 2003 Soon said at a US senate hearing that he had "not knowingly been 
> hired by, nor employed by, nor received grants from any organisation that had 
> taken advocacy positions with respect to the Kyoto protocol or the UN 
> Framework Convention on Climate Change."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:339661
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to