Planetary temperature controls CO2 levels — not humans

Excerpt:

Judging by the speech Murry Salby gave at the Sydney Institute, there’s a
blockbuster paper coming soon.
Listen to the speech: “Global Emission of Carbon Dioxide: The Contribution
from Natural 
Sources”<http://www.thesydneyinstitute.com.au/podcast/global-emission-of-carbon-dioxide-the-contribution-from-natural-sources/>

Professor Murry Salby is Chair of Climate Science at Macquarie University.
He’s been a visiting professorships at Paris, Stockholm, Jerusalem, and
Kyoto, and he’s spent time at the Bureau of Meterology in Australia.

Over the last two years he has been looking at C12 and C13 ratios and CO2
levels around the world, and has come to the conclusion that man-made
emissions have only a small effect on global CO2 levels. It’s not just that
man-made emissions don’t control the climate, they don’t even control global
CO2 levels.

The higher levels of CO2 in recent decades appear to be mostly due to
natural sources. He presented this research at the IUGG conference in
Melbourne recently, causing great discussion and shocking a few people. Word
reached the Sydney Institute, which rushed to arrange for him to speak,
given the importance of this work in the current Australian political
climate.

The ratio of C13 to C12 (two isotopes of carbon) in our atmosphere has been
declining, which is usually viewed as a signature of man-made CO2 emissions.
C12 makes up 99% of carbon in the atmosphere (nearly all atmospheric carbon
is in the form of CO2). C13 is much rarer — about 1%. Plants don’t like the
rarer C13 type as much; photosynthesis prefers C12 to C13 when absorbing CO2
from the air.

Prof Salby points out that while fossil fuels are richer in C12 than the
atmosphere, so too is plant life on Earth, and there isn’t a lot of
difference in the ratios of C13 to C12 in plants versus fossil fuels. So if
the C13 to C12 ratio is falling (as more C12 rich carbon is put into the air
by burning fossil fuels) then we can’t know if it’s due to man-made CO2 or
natural CO2 from plants.

Essentially we can measure man-made emissions reasonably well, but we can’t
measure the natural emissions and sequestrations of CO2 at all precisely —
the error bars are huge. Humans emits 5Gt or so per annum, but the oceans
emit about 90Gt and the land-plants about 60Gt, for a total of maybe 150Gt.
Many scientists have assumed that the net flows of carbon to and from
natural sinks and sources of CO2 cancel each other out, but there is no real
data to confirm this and it’s just a convenient assumption. The problem is
that even small fractional changes in natural emissions or sequestrations
swamp the human emissions.

Read more here:
http://joannenova.com.au/2011/08/blockbuster-planetary-temperature-controls-co2-levels-not-humans/


Presented for your reading enjoyment/information and not as a definitive
piece of evidence debunking man made global warming.

J

-

When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall
become as corrupt as Europe. - Thomas Jefferson

Politicians are people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel, go
out and buy some more tunnel.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:341242
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to