All but Huntsman and Romney were spot on about global warming. As for evolution, Paul and Perry are out there. Bachman just makes the mistake of thinking it's one or the other, which is a kind of out there but not as far.
. On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sad that the most logical sounding of all of them is Huntsman...and I > think I have a better shot at getting nominated than he does. > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:17 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> "I think there is a theory, a theory of evolution, and I don't accept it. >> ... The creator that I know created us, each and every one of us and created >> the universe, and the precise time and manner. ... I just don't think we're >> at the point where anybody has absolute proof on either side." >> >> - Ron Paul, Nov 1, 2007 >> >> I cannot and would not and will not vote for him. Sorry. >> >> I've been having fun reading this: >> http://www.npr.org/2011/09/07/140071973/in-their-own-words-gop-candidates-and-science?sc=fb&cc=fp >> >> If republicans weren't so f***ing moronic when it came to basic >> science...i'd like them a lot, because conservatism makes for a good >> legislative and economic model. But i just can't get past this shit. Ugh. >> >> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342394 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
