It's not accurate. The 98% number came from the debunked paper: Expert Credibility in Climate Change
Explains it well http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/08/05/expert-embarrassment-in-climate-change/ Or the number came from this: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/09/08/global-warming-a-98-consensus-of-nothing/ Either way it's a stupid joke and people got duped. . On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Contrary to your belief, stupid cartoons don't make your argument seem >> intelligent. >> > > I find the comic accurate, and concisely states a factually true position. > I fail to see the stupid part. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342622 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
